Yoo young chul biography definition
•
Yoo Young-chul
South Korean serial killer (born 1970)
In this Korean name, the family name is Yoo.
Yoo Young-chul | |
|---|---|
| Born | (1970-04-18) 18 April 1970 (age 54) Gochang County, South Korea |
| Nationality | South Korean |
| Other names | Raincoat Killer (레인 코트 킬러) |
| Height | 170 cm (5 ft 7 in) |
| Criminal status | In prison awaiting execution |
| Children | 1 |
| Motive | Resentment towards the rich and women |
| Criminal charge |
|
| Penalty | Death |
Span of crimes | 2003–2004 |
| Country | South Korea |
| Target(s) | |
| Killed | 20 convicted[1][2] |
Date apprehended | 15 July 2004 |
| Imprisoned at | Seoul Detention Center |
| Hangul | 유영철 |
| Hanja | 柳永哲 |
| Revised Romanization | Yu Yeongcheol |
| McCune–Reischauer | Yu Yŏngch'ŏl |
Yoo Young-chul (Korean:
•
The Raincoat Killer: Chasing a Predator in Korea
Videos
The Raincoat Killer: Chasing a Predator in Korea
Episodes
The Raincoat Killer: Chasing a Predator in Korea
Violent killings mål wealthy victims around the city. Matching footprints found at each scene suggest a serial murderer on the loose.
A report about missing sex workers leads to Yoo Young-chul's arrest. Under interrogation, he confesses, but detectives aren't sure what to believe.
As Yoo's victims are found buried and mutilated, a media storm descends upon the case. In need of tangible evidence, police head to his apartment.
•
In the global field of IR, there have been growing critical strands of seeing Western knowledge, practices, and institutions as not universal but parochial in terms of world theory and history (Acharya and Buzan 2019; Hobson 2012). Particularly, since Amitav Acharya’s and Barry Buzan’s 2007 special forum with the theme of ‘Why is there no non-Western IR theory?’ in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Japan-based journal, much research has been done regarding IR’s Western parochialism (Acharya and Buzan 2007; Acharya and Buzan 2017; Jones 2006; Shilliam 2011). Even former American Political Science Association President David Lake recently acknowledged this parochialism (Lake 2016). Within this line of critique, a call for pluralism and diversity in/of IR has gained more currency in the scholarship (Dunne, et al. 2013; Eun 2016). I